Microsoft Defender EASM
Vulnerabilities and exposure

Understand dashboards in Microsoft Defender EASM

In brief

The page was retitled and revised to describe eight dashboards, including inventory, attack surface, security posture, compliance, and risk insights. Several explanations and terms were also clarified.

What Defender admins need to know

Administrators can use the updated page to understand the broader dashboard coverage; no action is required.

Summaries are generated from the documentation change itself.

Documentation change

The comparison below shows only the changed extract. Use the full-page view for complete context.

Understand Defender EASM dashboards

Dashboards in Defender EASM

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management (Defender EASM) offers a series of foureight dashboards designed to help users quickly surface valuable insights derived from their Approved inventory. These dashboards help organizations prioritize the vulnerabilities, risks and compliance issues that pose the greatest threat to their Attack Surface, making it easy to quickly mitigate key issues.

Defender EASM provides eight dashboards:

The data underlying any dashboard chart can be exported to a CSV file. This export is useful for users who wish to import Defender EASM data into third party tools, or work off a CSV file when remediating any issues. To download chart data, first select the specific chart segment that contains the data you wish to download. Chart exports currently support individual chart segments; to download multiple segments from the same chart, you need to export each individual segment.

Selecting an individual chart segment opens a drill-down view of the data, listing any assets that comprise the segment count. At the top of this page, select Download CSV report to begin your export. This actionSelecting Download CSV report creates a task manager notification where you can track the status of your export.

Microsoft Excel enforces a character limit of 32,767 characters per cell. Some fields, like the Last banner column, might be improperly displayed due to this limitation. If you encounter an issue, try opening the file in another program that supports CSV files.

Marking CVEs as non-applicable

Many Defender EASM dashboards feature CVECommon Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) data, bringing your attention to potential vulnerabilities based on the web component infrastructure that powers your attack surface. For instance, CVEs are listed on the Attack Surface summary dashboard, categorized by their potential severity. Upon investigating these CVEs, you might determine that some are not relevant to your organization. This may be because you are running an unimpacted version of the web component, or your organization has different technical solutions in place to protect you from that specific vulnerability.

From the drilldown view of any CVE-related chart, next to the Download CSV report button, you now have the option to set an observation as non-applicable. Selecting this value will route you to an inventory list of all assets associated to that observation, and you can then elect to mark all observations as non-applicable from this page. For more information on marking observations as non-applicable, see Modifying inventory assets.

Screenshot of attack surface drilldown for medium severity priorities.

This detailedThe observation details view for any observation includes the title of the issue, a description, and remediation guidance from the Defender EASM team. In this example, the description explains how expired SSL certificates can lead to critical business functions becoming unavailable, preventing customers or employees from accessing web content and thus damaging your organization’s brand. The Remediation section provides advice on how to swiftly fix the issue; in this example, Microsoft recommends that you review the certificates associated with the impacted host assets, update the coinciding SSL certificates, and update your internal procedures to ensure that SSL certificates are updated in a timely manner.

Finally, the Asset section lists any entities that have been impacted by this specific security concern.the selected observation. In this example, a user wants to investigate the impacted assets to learn more about the expired SSL Certificate. You can select any asset name from this list to view the Asset Details page.

From the Asset Details page, select the SSL certificates tab to view more information about the expired certificate. In this example, the listed certificate shows an Expires date in the past, indicating that the certificate is currently expired and therefore likely inactive. This sectionThe SSL certificates tab also provides the name of the SSL certificatecertificate, which you can then send to the appropriate team within your organization for swift remediation.

Screenshot of the impacted assets list for an expired SSL certificate observation, showing affected host assets.

Secure the cloud

ThisThe Secure the cloud section of the Attack Surface Summary dashboard provides insight on the cloud technologies used across your infrastructure. As most organizations adapt to the cloud gradually, the hybrid nature of your online infrastructure can be difficult to monitor and manage. Defender EASM helps organizations understand the usage of specific cloud technologies across your Attack Surface, mapping cloud host providers to your confirmed assets to inform your cloud adoption program and ensure compliance with your organizations process.

Screenshot of the cloud infrastructure chart showing confirmed assets grouped by cloud host provider.

Sensitive services

ThisThe Sensitive services section displays sensitive services detected on your Attack Surface that should be assessed and potentially adjusted to ensure the security of your organization. This chart highlights any services that are historically vulnerable to attack or are common vectors of information leakage to malicious actors. Any assets in this section should be investigated, and Microsoft recommends that organizations consider alternative services with a better security posture to mitigate risk.

Screenshot of the Sensitive Services chart showing detected services grouped by name, with no high-risk services found in this example.

CVE exposure

The first chart in the Security Posture dashboard relates to the management of an organization’s website portfolio. Microsoft analyzes website components such as frameworks, server software, and third party plugins and then matches them to a current list of Common VulnerabilityVulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) to identify vulnerability risks to your organization. The web components that comprise each website are inspected daily to ensure recency and accuracy.

Screenshot of the CVE exposure chart showing counts of assets affected by detected web component vulnerabilities.

This chart provides insight on the security posture related to where an organization’s hosts are located. Risk associated with ownership of Autonomous systems depends on the size, maturity of an organization’s IT department.

Screenshot of the hosting and networking chart showing host assets grouped by autonomous system ownership.

Each bar of the chart is selectable, routing to a list of all assets that comprise the value.

Domains configuration

ThisThe Domains configuration section helps organizations understand the configuration of their domain names, surfacing any domains that might be susceptible to unnecessary risk. Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) domain status codes indicate the status of a domain name registration. All domains have at least one code, although multiple codes can apply to a single domain. This section is useful to understanding the policies in place to manage your domains, or missing policies that leave domains vulnerable.

Screenshot of the domain configuration chart showing domains grouped by EPP status codes to identify missing configuration protections.

Open Ports

ThisThe Open Ports section helps users understand how their IP space is managed, detecting services that are exposed on the open internet. Attackers commonly scan ports across the internet to look for known exploits related to service vulnerabilities or misconfigurations. Microsoft identifies these open ports to complement vulnerability assessment tools, flagging observations for review to ensure they are properly managed by your information technology team.

Screenshot of the open ports chart showing assets grouped by internet-exposed port for security review.

The SSL configuration and organization charts display common SSL-related issues that might impact functions of your online infrastructure.

Screenshot of SSL configuration and organization charts showing certificate issues and ownership by organization and business unit.

For instance, the SSL configuration chart displays any detected configuration issues that can disrupt your online services. This includes expired SSL certificates and certificates using outdated signature algorithms like SHA1 and MD5, resulting in unnecessary security risk to your organization.

This chart organizes your websites by status code. Options include Active, Inactive, Requires Authorization, Broken, and Browser Error; users can select any component on the bar graph to view a comprehensive list of assets that comprise the value.

Screenshot of the Websites by status chart showing website assets grouped by HTTP response category.

Live sites with cert issues

This chart displays live PII sites by their usage of SSL certificates. By referencing this chart, you can quickly understand the hashing algorithms used across your sites that contain personal identifiable information.

Screenshot of the Live PII sites by certificate posture chart showing sites with personal information grouped by SSL hashing algorithm.

Login websites by protocol

A login page is a page on a website where a user has the option to enter a username and password to gain access to services hosted on that site. Login pages have specific requirements under GDPR, so Defender EASM references the DOM of all scanned pages to search for code that correlates to a login. For instance, login pages must be secure to be compliant. This firstThe Login websites by protocol chart displays Loginlogin websites by protocol (HTTP or HTTPS), and the secondLogin websites by certificate posture chart displays them by certificate posture.

Screenshot of the Login websites by protocol chart showing login pages grouped by HTTP versus HTTPS for GDPR compliance review.

  1. Security logging and monitoring: Lack of proper security logging and alerting, or related misconfigurations, that can impact an organization’s visibility and subsequent accountability over their security posture.
  2. Server-side request forgery: Web applications that fetch a remote resource without validating the user-supplied URL.

This dashboard provides a description of each critical risk, information on why it matters, and remediation guidance alongside a list of any assets that are potentially impacted. For more information, see the OWASP Top 10 project.

CWE Top 25 Software Weaknesses dashboard

This dashboard is based on the Top 25 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) list provided annually by MITRE. These CWEs represent the most common and impactful software weaknesses that are easy to find and exploit. This dashboard displays all CWEs included on the list over the last five years, and lists all of your inventory assets that might be impacted by each CWE. For each CWE, the dashboard provides a description and examples of the vulnerability, and lists related CVEs. The CWEs are organized by year, and each section is expandable or collapsible. Referencing this dashboard helps your vulnerability mediation efforts by helping you identify the greatest risks to your organization based on other observed exploits.

Screenshot of the CWE Top 25 Software Weaknesses dashboard showing weaknesses, related CVEs, and impacted assets organized by year.

CISA Known Exploits dashboard

While there are hundreds of thousands of identified CVE vulnerabilities, only a small subset has been identified by the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) as recently exploited by threat actors. This list includes less than .5% of all identified CVEs; for this reason, it is instrumental to helping security professionals prioritize the remediation of the greatest risks to their organization. Those who remediate threats based on this list operate with the upmost efficiency because they’re prioritizing the vulnerabilities that have resulted in real security incidents.